Plan of Action

Childhood obesity has more than tripled in American adolescents in the past decade. Nearly 32% of American children are overweight or obese.

The intervention I would like to implement relates to my environmental determinant. I would like to execute an intervention in schools removing vending machines and adding more nutritious foods to lunch meals. Kids spend 2/3 of their day in school and I believe they should be served nutritious foods as some of their only options. “School-based efforts have been oriented towards prevention, targeting all students in selected classes to avoid stigmatization of obese children. Planet Health is an interdisciplinary curriculum that aims to decrease dietary fat consumption, increase consumption of fruits and vegetables, promote physical activity, and limit television time.” (Ebbling, Pawlak, Ludwig, 2002)

A barrier for this would definitely be the cost. It’s expensive to change the school food system to be mostly nutritional food options. There really isn’t a way to change the cost, but this type of intervention would be effective in the long run, so the cost is worth it.

Another obstacle is a social barrier. Families might have a problem not having the option of buying sweet or salty snack in a vending machine or being able to have their children buy a soda in the lunch line. Some parents might view it as “taking away their rights.” But, I think if children get in the habit of eating healthy, the urge to have sugary foods will decrease over time.

In order for this plan to work, the stakeholders need to be involved. (Strength in numbers.) I think the biggest contributor to this issue could be the health insurance companies. They could contribute by backing the public health officials that implement this intervention. I don’t think it will be an issue getting insurance companies on board with this idea because it essentially is beneficial to them in the long run, because they won’t have to pay for children who have type two diabetes.

You could see how effective this intervention is by checking school cafeterias monthly profit history to see how many kids are still buying lunch compared to before. This way of doing this is easier then running an actual test because it is cost effective and not time consuming. Doing an intervention like this, I expect outcomes to be lower than before, but overtime I think kids will start buying their lunches at school again out of convenience.

Work Cited:

Ebbeling, C. B., Pawlak, D. B., & Ludwig, D. S. (n.d.). Retrieved fromhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673602096782 

Childhood Obesity Interventions

Problem Statement:

Childhood obesity has more than tripled in American adolescents in the past decade. Nearly 32% of American children are overweight or obese.

“Over the last 50 years, obesity has been increasing at an alarming rate and is now recognized by leading government health authorities, such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and National Institutes of Health (NIH), as a disease. In the United States alone, obesity affects more than 60 million individuals and is considered the second leading cause of preventable death. “ (Allergan, 2005)

One potential intervention could be a family-based intervention. The International Journal Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity did a particular study focusing on parent engagement, this study utilized community-based research to develop and test a family-centered intervention for low-income families with preschool-aged children enrolled in Head Start. (Davison, 2013) Some of the intervention components included: 1) educating parents by sending home letters sent home to families reporting child body mass index, 2) a communication campaign to raise parents’ awareness of their child’s weight status, 3) encouraging family engaged activities, and 4) a 6-week parent-led program to strengthen parents’ communication skills, conflict resolution, resource-related empowerment for healthy lifestyles, social networks, and media literacy. (Davison, 2013) I believe family education is one of the best ways to conquer childhood obesity, especially considering kids look up to their parents as role models. The results from this intervention compared with pre intervention, children at post intervention exhibited significant improvements in their rate of obesity, light physical activity, daily TV viewing, and dietary intake.

Another effective intervention could be going straight for the diet of children. One way to decrease the prevalence of childhood obesity would be cutting back/eliminating carbonated and sugary beverages. The BMJ did a study where they discouraged the consumption of “fizzy” drinks with positive affirmation of a balanced healthy diet. They believed the children would respond best to a simple, uncomplicated message so they were told that by decreasing sugar consumption they would improve overall wellbeing and that by reducing the consumption of diet carbonated drinks they would benefit dental health. (BMJ, 2004) A school based educational program aimed at reducing the consumption of carbonated drinks to prevent excessive weight gain in children aged 7-11 year olds would be effective. At the end of a 12-month study, the BMJ was able to conclude both the intervention group and the control group showed a significant increase in consumption of water, in part related to the promotion of drinking water during school to “improve concentration.” (BMJ, 2013)

Also, an intervention that could be implemented is a campaign that limits the amount of fast food commercials viewed on children networks. Fast foods are one of the most advertised products on television and children are often the targeted market. In Sweden, television advertising to children less than 12 years of age has not been permitted since commercial television began over a decade ago. Norway, Denmark, Austria, Ireland, Australia, and Greece also have some restrictions on television advertising to young children. (Dehghan, 2005) I think this is an excellent way to limit the prevalence of obesity in America, considering it’s already had some positive results in these other countries.

In conclusion, there are so many interventions that can be tried and tested, but health officials can give parents and children as much education as possible, the true change that’s going to be made is in the person’s behavior.

Word Cited:

Dehghan, Mahshid. "Childhood Obesity, Prevalence and Prevention." Nutrition Journal. N.p., 2 Sept. 2005. Web. 20 Apr. 2013.

Janet, James. "Preventing Childhood Obesity by Reducing Consumption of Carbonated Drinks: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial." Ncbi. N.p., 22 May 2004. Web. 19 Apr. 2013. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC416601/>.

Stakeholders of Childhood Obesity

Problem Statement:

Childhood obesity has more than tripled in American adolescents in the past decade. Nearly 32% of American children are overweight or obese.

Stakeholders are persons, organizations, or other groups that share a stake in the issue. These are the people who are affect by the problem or the solution of the outcome. For childhood obesity, the most obvious stakeholder would be the children who are or potentially obese, but stakeholders who have to deal with the problem could potentially be organizations who promote clean health or insurance companies. Also, physicians and public health officials who have to deal with the affects of obesity on the society are stakeholders.

One intervention that could be done would be a family-based intervention. “Family intervention is implemented on the premise that parental support, family functioning, and home environment are important determinants of treatment outcomes.” (Ebbling, Pawlak, Ludwig, 2002) “For instance, one study reported that children who received dietary counseling, encouragement to exercise, and family therapy for 14–18 months had a smaller increase in BMI than controls, who received no treatment, though drop-out rate was substantial. (Ebbling, Pawlak, Ludwig, 2002)

Another intervention that could be very successful is a school intervention. Kids spend 2/3 of their day in school and I believe they should be served nutritious foods as some of their only options. “School-based efforts have been oriented towards prevention, targeting all students in selected classes to avoid stigmatization of obese children. Planet Health is an interdisciplinary curriculum that aims to decrease dietary fat consumption, increase consumption of fruits and vegetables, promote physical activity, and limit television time.” (Ebbling, Pawlak, Ludwig, 2002) “It is increasingly recognized that sugar-sweetened beverage consumption contributes to childhood obesity. Most states have adopted laws that regulate the availability of sugar-sweetened beverages in school settings. However, such policies have encountered resistance from consumer and parent groups, as well as the beverage industry.” (Mello, Pomeranz, Moran, 2007) If children aren’t given the option to have sugary beverages, then it’s possible that they will stop drinking them in other aspects of their lives as well.

Interventions that take affirmative action are the interventions that get the job done. Mayor Bloomberg just banned the sale of soda in places like movie theaters in New York and people are complaining and arguing that it’s unethical to make a ban like that. But, if he doesn’t try to stop the prevalence of obesity, who will? Educating people on the negative affects of the unhealthy foods consumed can be effective, but in order for a healthy diet to be implemented day in and day out, society has to change their behavior.

Work Cited:

Ebbeling, C. B., Pawlak, D. B., & Ludwig, D. S. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673602096782

Hassler, P. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.childrensdefense.org/policy-priorities/childrens-health/child-nutrition/childhood-obesity.html

Mello, M. (2008, April). The interplay of public health law and industry self-regulation: The case of sugar-sweetened beverage sales in schools. Retrieved from http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2006.107680

Key Determinants of Childhood Obesity

Childhood obesity has more than tripled in American adolescents in the past decade. Nearly 32% of American children are overweight or obese.

Biological Determinants

Biological determinants refer to a person’s physical, anatomic, or medical reasons a problem should occur. For childhood obesity, a lot of times it is hereditary in the child’s genes. Children whose parents are overweight or obese are at higher risk for becoming obese themselves. “A study in the Journal of Pediatrics, for instance, found five independent risk factors for childhood overweight. The main risk factor was parental weight.” (Yale, 2013) Nearly 80% of obese 10- to 14-year-olds with an obese parent will be obese as adults.

Social and Cultural Determinants

The American Heart Association estimates that one out of every three American children between the ages of 2 and 19 is obese. Some cultural challenges related to childhood obesity are the poor and ethnic. “For example, ethnic minorities often find women with fuller figures more attractive than thin women. In some cultures girls are not encouraged to exercise as much as boys. Girls receive the message that a fuller figure is a sign of good eating and good health. Recommended diets for obese children seldom include traditional foods that ethnic minorities like and eat on a regular basis.” (Margolis, 2013) Some cultural statistics include:

31.9% of all white male children are obese.

29.5% of all white female children are obese.

30.8% African-American male children are obese.

39.2% African-American female children are obese.

40.8% Mexican-American male children are obese.

35.0% Mexican-American female children are obese.

(Margolis 2013)

Besides cultural determinants, there are also social determinants including socioeconomic status and peer influences. Children who are raised in a lower social class are more likely to eat improperly than a child who has money to spend on healthier choices. Also, if a child hangs around other kids who eat poorly, the poor eating habits will influence the child leading to obesity.

Environmental Determinants

Family in the home environment can influence the behaviors of children and teens associated to calorie consumption and physical activity. Parents are role models for their children who are likely to develop habits similar to their parents. Habits, and beliefs about food selection and how to spend family leisure time are significant factors to make a healthy relationship with food. Some research also shows that extensive viewing of television can cause obesity in children.

Even in schools, kids are being served food that is not healthy and nutritious as even an option. “Students have access to sugar drinks and less healthy foods at school throughout the day from vending machines and school canteens and at fundraising events, school parties, and sporting events.” (CDC, 2012) Advertisements also play a role because the technology era has truly taken over this generations lives and advertisements have become a social norm. “Nearly half of U.S. middle and high schools allow advertising of less healthy foods, which impacts students' ability to make healthy food choices. In addition, foods high in total calories, sugars, salt, and fat, and low in nutrients are highly advertised and marketed through media targeted to children and adolescents, while advertising for healthier foods is almost nonexistent in comparison.” (CDC, 2012)

Economic Determinants

Economic determinants refer to issues with money on individual or community level. Lower income families already have a hard time making it by, but worrying about healthy foods for their kids is just the cherry on top for them. For poor families living in cities, it’s very hard to find a local grocery store because there are so many corner carry-outs and convenience stores that just serve greasy and fried foods.

Work Cited:

Yale medical group. (2013). Retrieved from            

 http://www.yalemedicalgroup.org/stw/Page.asp?PageID=STW001880

Margolis, R. (2011). Cultural factors of obesity in children. Retrieved from                   http://www.livestrong.com/article/357840-cultural-factors-of-obesity-in-children/

CDC. (2012, April 27). Centers for disease control and prevention. Retrieved from             http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/problem.html

Anderson, P., Butcher, K., & Levine, P. (2011). Economic perspectives on childhood obesity. Retrieved from      

http://qa.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/economic_perspectives/2003/3qeppart3.pdf

            

Obesity Indicators

Childhood obesity has more than tripled in American adolescents in the past decade. Nearly 32% of American children are overweight or obese.

            Obesity has rapidly increased in children ages 1-18 and is continuing to grow. One’s body weight is measured as a BMI, which means body mass index and also depends on the person’s height, not just their weight. In general, being “overweight” is measured at a BMI of 25-29.9 and being “obese” is measured at a BMI greater than 30. Of the large population of adolescents, 80% of children who are considered overweight or obese are ages 10 to 15. Obesity is a huge problem within itself, but it also can lead to greater issues like, heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, etc. Through active surveillance, it’s clear that child obesity is an epidemic. The USDA notes the on energy intake, energy expenditure, and "energy balance," who eat more "empty calories" and expend fewer calories through physical activity are more likely to be obese than other children.

            There really is a wide array of direct indicators for why obesity is so prevalent in our modern society. “Many kids are spending less time exercising and more time in front of the TV, computer, or video-game console. And today's busy families have fewer free moments to prepare nutritious, home-cooked meals.” From fast food to electronics, quick and easy is the reality for many people. The technology era has more than taken over our social lives, but now has taken over our ability to maintain a healthy diet for the children. Another potential direct indicator could be the media. While kids are sitting down watching TV, they experience dozens of commercials about fried and greasy foods that are psychologically designed to make you want to have them.

            In contrast, indirect indicators do not directly measure the problem, but instead measure related factors. Some factors that can help contribute to the obesity are the change in children's environment over the past three decades to distraught the energy balance equation. In particular, the USDA examines changes in the food market in schools and childcare settings, and in the role of parents—paying attention to the timing of these changes. In supermarkets and in some, not all, school cafeteria foods, the healthy foods are priced higher than the sweet and salty snacks. These types of underlying factors can also lead to obesity.

            Both indirect and direct indicators can be widely varied as well as their significance to contributing to obesity. The USDA’s statistics are reliable because they preformed control studies over a period time to gain the data. But, statistics showing sample size studies can’t always be accurate because they can be biased based on certain parts f the region, race, culture, etc. 

Work Cited:

http://www.childrensdefense.org/policy-priorities/childrens-health/child-nutrition/childhood-obesity.html

http://www.vaxa.com/childhood-obesity-statistics.cfm

Childhood Obesity

The Growing Obesity Problem in Children:

            Obesity has become more and more prevalent in the United States within the last ten years. Specifically, obesity has rapidly increased in children ages 1-19. One’s body weight is measured as a BMI, which means body mass index and also depends on the person’s height. In general, being “overweight” is measured at a BMI of 25-29.9 and being “obese” is measured at a BMI greater than 30. Obesity is a huge problem within itself, but it also can lead to greater issues like, heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, etc.

Defining the Problem:

Childhood obesity has more than tripled in American adolescents in the past decade. By 2010, the percentage of obese children aged 1–19 years old, in the United States, increased from 5% in 1980 to nearly 18%.

Relevance and Importance:

Having a healthy body weight is important because children are still developing and if fat is cushioning their bones, then their bones are more like to be brittle. Also, children who are obese usually don’t participate in any physical activities either at home or school, so the rate of obesity will continue to grow from all the sedentary activities. This problem is relevant to the US because it has more than tripled in a decade and is contusing to grow.

Why this topic interesting:

This topic is interesting to me because this problem is increasing and not much is being done to stop it. Many people feel that this issue can only be fixed with eating habits, but its more than just than. People need to learn to exercise and exercise properly by doing workouts that are high intensity and fat burning. Children also need to learn that being active is fun and rewarding compared to sitting in front of the TV playing video games and becoming a couch potato. Public Health officials shouldn’t expect kids to make all their healthy decisions on their own; parents also need to be actively involved literally and figuratively. Parents should be taught what is a proper diet and exercise for their children.

The points that I mentioned about the growing rate of obesity are just some factors that lead to this cause. Other factors and people at risk of becoming obese are the lower class, different races/ethnicities, and how much education one has. Obesity is not a problem that can be change overnight. This problem is demanding and will take a long time to just begin to reverse it. Physicians, Public Health officials, and parents need to put their full attention into the children to stop this problem from developing and eventually quadrupling itself. 

Contagion

In the movie Contagion, the main character, Beth Emhoff, returns from a business trip from Hong Kong and almost immediately drops dead from what the physicians in the movie believe was the bird flu virus. Before her death, she also infects her son who later dies in that same day. Since Beth traveled back from China, she infected everyone who came in contact with her on her travels. The flu virus became a quickly spreading pandemic, resulting in the closings of schools, parks, airports, and most public establishments.

I’ve seen Contagion twice now and after both times I became more conscious of what I touch and how many times I wipe my nose or rub my eyes. Although this movie wasn’t a perfect plot setup, they do a good job making the viewers aware of the germs all around them.

           

            This movie was a perfect example of an outbreak, which is a sudden start of something unwelcome like a disease. Following the outbreak of the bird flu, disease investigators came in a tried to identify the point where the outbreak started, map out the spread, and then focus on dealing with the problem. In the movie, that was Kate Winslet’s character’s job. The difference between isolation and quarantine is when you isolate someone you separate the ill persons who have a disease or sickness from those who are healthy. Quarantine is used to separate well persons who may have been exposed to a communicable disease to see if they become ill. It’s basically a test to see if the person is immune.

            In the movie, The American CDC and the World Health Organization were not prepared for such an outbreak and their reaction rates resulted in a pandemic. A few key ideas I think would help with national and international preparedness is being able to share information. Communication with the public would help inform the citizens to take precautionary action. Another way to help plan would be warnings, via the media, that are unambiguous and consistent by giving specific information about who could potentially be at risk and what one can do to prevent them from catching anything. Also, if evacuations are needed, they should be ordered in terms of agencies. These are only a few of things that could help with emergency preparedness, but these three examples are some important factors that should be taken accounted for. 

US Health Care: The Good News

The U.S. Health Care system is a 2.6 trillion dollar investment. Compared to other countries, the U.S. spends the most on Health Care and has the worst results. Throughout the country, there are about 50 million Americans uninsured. Doctors, hospitals, insurance companies, and the government are working on a Health Care plan that will support our entire country.

           

In the documentary “US Health Care: The Good News,” discusses new and innovative ways to have an effective Health Care plan. The Dartmouth Atlas Project has documented differences in how medical resources are distributed and used in the United States. The findings have helped policymakers, the media, health care analysts and others improve their understanding of the effectiveness of our Health Care system. They found that spending more and more money on this current system, doesn’t improve the overall health of the citizens.

           

I personally feel that having access to Health Care is a right and not a privilege. Our nation’s Founding Fathers once stated, “We have rights to life, liberty and property and an advocated government that protects those rights.” Our government was originally built to protect the rights we are entitled to and the right to see a doctor when needed is part of that.

One of the Health Care systems I thought was interesting and effective in the video was the one in Mason County, Colorado. The doctors there treated everyone that needs to be seen by a doctor, rich or poor. They were able to lower the cost of Health Care by 1/3, which had better effects on the outcome of health in the community. I thought this part of the video was interesting because if this county is able to have an effective, reduced cost, Health Care system, why isn’t the rest of the nation taking action in this plan? The doctors in this county were willing to sacrifice some of their salary to treat all the patients, which is a big reason why a plan like this wouldn’t be effective to the whole country because many doctors are not willing to sacrifice their money.

If a Health Care plan were to happen in other states it would be rather difficult. Like I said before, many doctors won’t be willing to sacrifice their salary to reduce the cost to see all patients. In order for a functional Health Care system to take place, doctors must recognize the fact that they are doctors because they want to improve the well being of citizens and not because they have a large paycheck. Nevertheless, a system that mimics Mason County’s system would be more cost effective for the U.S. and could very well take place in my hometown, as well as, other states throughout the nation.  

Vaccine Wars

My view on modern medicine and vaccinations is very indecisive and changes almost everyday. Some days I take an osteopathic opinion because I fee like what people put into their bodies should be holistic and natural. When I see commercials on TV about a medicine that someone should take that has a million and one side affects is frightening. It makes me question why we should be taking this medicine if “in some cases causes death.” But, on some days I take an allopathic opinion because I still get vaccinated annually for different types of diseases and I’m fine. It makes me wonder if the only reason parents are thinking vaccines are harmful to their children’s health is because the children are too young to be getting serious vaccines.

            Herd immunity is a big discussion in this video that sways my opinion. Herd immunity occurs when the vaccination of a significant portion of a population provides protection for individuals who have not developed immunity. Herd immunity is important in a Public Health standpoint because if there is a significant amount of people vaccinated from life threatening diseases, then there will technically be less outbreaks of that disease because a majority of them are vaccinated. 

            I feel like vaccinations have become a very personal decision within the last decade because of all the side affects that come with vaccinations in this day and age. I personally believe that families are the only ones who have a choice in whether or not their children will be vaccinated against a disease. But, I also feel like it’s the public health official’s job to inform the families with as much information as possible before they make their decision whether or not to vaccinate their kids. Families should not feel coerced.

            In today’s world, I think the social media has a huge affect on whether or not parents decide to vaccinate. If you search “side affects of vaccines” on YouTube, you would find a wide array of people who have claimed to have serious side affects from being vaccinated. While it can’t be proven just yet, I have to say, I have started to side with the media at some points during this video, because everybody is starting to claim they changed after receiving a shot.

If physicians would like to increase the amount of people getting vaccinations, there really needs to be more research and education from people claiming to have developed autism from vaccinations. At this rate, I wouldn’t vaccinate my child against anything if I thought he/she would develop autism afterwards. Serious research needs to be done on this issue before physicians can even think about people giving their children vaccinated against diseases without any resistance. 

Secondhand Smoke

How likely is it for a woman to develop lung cancer through secondhand smoke from her husband? The study on the results of non-smoking wives of heavy smokers sums up that wives of heavy smokers had a higher risk of developing lung cancer than non-smoking husbands. The correspondence of heavy smokers and their wives depended on the age of the couple, what the husband’s occupation was, and where they lived. Lung cancer was not the only sickness to be passed on from secondhand smoking; asthma and emphysema were also developed diseases. The results of this study show the possible reasons why women in there midlife develop lung cancer without ever smoking a cigarette.

            One of the most interesting things about the dated collected is, women were more likely to develop lung cancer from secondhand smoking if they lived in a more rural area, particularly in agricultural families. The study suggests this to be true because the husband and wife have more mutual contact throughout the day because the husbands work on farms, where as husbands who work in an urban area are only home for a short amount of time throughout the day, meaning the couples that live in an urban area have less of a chance of developing lung cancer. The data is also interesting because it tests other issues like a husband’s drinking habit and whether or not that led to lung cancer. Also, it studied if secondhand smoke led to any other cancers. All results pointed fingers at secondhand smoke leading to lung cancer as the only cancer developed.

            One of the advantages of doing a cause and effect study design is that it identifies the underlying causes, such as lung cancer. Another advantage to this study is it shows a better understanding for the effects. Lastly, cause and effect cases are relatively cost effective. They focus on getting straight to the point of the underlying causes without costing too much.

            I personally believe the study shows that secondhand smoke is the cause of lung cancer. The article explains that husbands drinking habits led to no effect on their wives lung cancer. Also, the smoking habits didn’t lead to any other cancers like, stomach or cervical cancer. All of the data showed that the majority of women with lung cancer were wives of heavy smokers. With these statistics, I strongly believe that lung cancer developed in non-smokers is strictly from secondhand smoke. 

Vitals Signs of Binge Drinking

The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report focuses on the dangers of binge drinking and how teens are influenced by adult woman to drink. In this article, an example of the some of the findings include: binge drinking is responsible for half of the 23,000 youth deaths in 5 year, binge drinking is a danger for social problems among women and girls, including alcohol abused pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases, and breast cancer. Much of the data contributing to this report comes from BRFSS surveys, The CDC and YRBS surveys.  

Binge drinking is a huge Public Health issue because it is responsible for thousands of lives and also leads to physical problems like, injuries, violence, liver disease, heart disease, stroke, breast and other cancers, reduced cognitive function, and alcohol dependence. Binge drinking is also a Public Health issue because it also affects the development of your brain. Since the brain is not fully developed until age 25, damaging it with alcohol has a major affect on its development.

 Most of the data collected in this report was shocking. I had no idea that binge drinking took so many young women’s lives, but I was not shocked with the affects of binge drinking. However, since the data was collected by survey, there are some limitations. One limitation being, you can’t always trust the integrity of people taking the survey, especially with surveys about teens and underage drinking. They might not want to admit to authorities that they take part in illegal drinking. BRFSS and YRBS data are self-reported survey, which shows that people might be biased or dishonest. Another limitation to collecting data through surveys is not having a large enough sample group to represent the entire population. Also, BRFSS can’t collect data from woman living on college campuses or military bases.

It’s already difficult to convince teens and young adults to resist binge drinking and there are already many campaigns to educate the teens on the dangers of drinking. But, one of the biggest ways to prevent binge drinking with women would be to educate them on what the alcohol does to your body, specifically, on how the dry calorie intake affects their bodies. Young women usually have to take a health class while in high school that already gives teens the dangers of binge drinking. Also, there are several advertisements and commercials being broadcasted on television on how teens and adults should never drink and drive. Technically, educating women from a nutritional standpoint might draw their attention more than sicknesses. If they can’t see that they could end up with cancer or heart disease later on in life, then to them it might not be true, but if teens and adults could physically see their body changing from excess alcohol use, they might think twice before drinking again.