Problem Statement:
Childhood obesity has more than tripled in American
adolescents in the past decade. Nearly 32% of American children are overweight
or obese.
“Over the last 50 years, obesity has been increasing at an
alarming rate and is now recognized by leading government health authorities,
such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and National Institutes of Health
(NIH), as a disease. In the United States alone, obesity affects more than 60
million individuals and is considered the second leading cause of preventable
death. “ (Allergan, 2005)
One potential intervention could be a family-based
intervention. The International Journal
Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity did a particular study focusing
on parent engagement, this study utilized community-based research to develop
and test a family-centered intervention for low-income families with
preschool-aged children enrolled in Head Start. (Davison, 2013) Some of the intervention
components included: 1) educating parents by sending home letters sent home to
families reporting child body mass index, 2) a communication campaign to raise
parents’ awareness of their child’s weight status, 3) encouraging family
engaged activities, and 4) a 6-week parent-led program to strengthen parents’
communication skills, conflict resolution, resource-related empowerment for
healthy lifestyles, social networks, and media literacy. (Davison, 2013) I
believe family education is one of the best ways to conquer childhood obesity,
especially considering kids look up to their parents as role models. The
results from this intervention compared with pre intervention, children at post
intervention exhibited significant improvements in their rate of obesity, light
physical activity, daily TV viewing, and dietary intake.
Another effective intervention could be going straight for
the diet of children. One way to decrease the prevalence of childhood obesity
would be cutting back/eliminating carbonated and sugary beverages. The BMJ did
a study where they discouraged the consumption of “fizzy” drinks with positive
affirmation of a balanced healthy diet. They believed the children would
respond best to a simple, uncomplicated message so they were told that by
decreasing sugar consumption they would improve overall wellbeing and that by
reducing the consumption of diet carbonated drinks they would benefit dental
health. (BMJ, 2004) A school based educational program aimed at reducing the
consumption of carbonated drinks to prevent excessive weight gain in children
aged 7-11 year olds would be effective. At the end of a 12-month study, the BMJ
was able to conclude both the intervention group and the control group showed a
significant increase in consumption of water, in part related to the promotion
of drinking water during school to “improve concentration.” (BMJ, 2013)
Also, an intervention that could be implemented is a
campaign that limits the amount of fast food commercials viewed on children
networks. Fast foods are one of the most advertised products on television and
children are often the targeted market. In Sweden, television advertising to
children less than 12 years of age has not been permitted since commercial
television began over a decade ago. Norway, Denmark, Austria, Ireland,
Australia, and Greece also have some restrictions on television advertising to
young children. (Dehghan, 2005) I think this is an excellent way to limit the
prevalence of obesity in America, considering it’s already had some positive
results in these other countries.
In conclusion, there are so many interventions that can be
tried and tested, but health officials can give parents and children as much
education as possible, the true change that’s going to be made is in the
person’s behavior.
Word Cited:
Dehghan, Mahshid. "Childhood Obesity, Prevalence and
Prevention." Nutrition Journal. N.p., 2 Sept. 2005. Web. 20 Apr. 2013.
Janet, James. "Preventing Childhood Obesity by Reducing
Consumption of Carbonated Drinks: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial."
Ncbi. N.p., 22 May 2004. Web. 19 Apr. 2013.
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC416601/>.
Hi Laura,
ReplyDeleteYou did a nice job looking up current strategies in addressing the obesity epidemic. I wasn't sure, though, which key determinants they addressed based on your writing. You also listed 3 potential strategies to address childhood obesity, which is good. In the future, be sure to also say which key determinants are used (biological, social, etc).
When you do your final paper, you'll want to plug your 3 intervention options into the decision matrix we used in lab. This matrix is what we used to assess the cost, feasibility, etc. of interventions (we went around the room and assigned numbers 1-3 to each, then tallied them up to figure out which one was best). Once you choose an intervention, you should defend it based on the outcome of the matrix.
Erin
Laura,
ReplyDeleteI think you did a really nice job coming up with interventions and going into good detail about each one. I also liked how you incorporated interventions already in place to help reinforce your point.